HONGYANG GROUP Belgium Technical Center

Fax: +86 (577)88097280

HONGYANG Group logo

HONGYANG GROUP Belgium Technical Center , Discuss Technical Problem , Suply After Service Online of Fuel Dispenser, Please Regist Firstly

U101-F Heavy Duty Flowmeter

fuel-dispenser

U101-F Heavy Duty Flowmeter

This Flowmeter is to measure the exact volume of the dispensed fuel. which is designed for non-commercial use only. this flowmeter is reliable ,inexpensive, simple installation and easy calibration on the workplace.

Materials:

Body: teflon

seals: Buna-N

Technical Specifications:

Litre: 4 digits

Totalt: 8 digits

Flow rate range:20L~120L/min

Accuracy:±1%

Environmental condition:-40~~+70degree

Package:

Product ID Net Weight Cross Weight Dimension

U101-F 8kg/case of 1 9kg/case of 1 28×25×18cm/case of 1

products links

links

technical archives

    on quickly increase in recent year, consumption of finished oil increase al well, the vapor pollution and resource waste in forecourt become more important safety factor in considerable filing station, safety distance and vapor density in particular. At present, vapor separator device is installed and obtain content effect in most of large and middle cities reference to foreign improving measures. Its recovery principle is divided as two phases: first phase refers to closed discharge from tank vehicle; second phase refers to vapor reco fuel dispenser very as refueling oil. Phase I vapor-recovery system The first phase system aims at to rebuild the delivery pipe and vapor recovery pipe between vehicle tank and tank. (Diagram 4-1) The volume of vapor will be increased as flowing into tank because of waves and shock. Therefore, the inlet pipe should be deeply stretched under oil level so as to reduce oil w fuel dispenser aves. As for a tank exceeding 945L of volume, inlet pipe is needed stretching into oil no higher 15cm than bottom of tank. Oil flows into tank from under level, vapor flow back into vehicle tank under pressure. In principle, the volume of oil and vapor is corrective. In order to make as little as vapor volatize during delivery, the structure of traditional ventilating pipe should be improved, making system in sealed state under normal pressure range. Reclaimed vapor is dealt with through condensation, adsorption and burn after taking back. Its operation principle is similar to the vapor system of balanced nozzle. Diagram 4-1: Phase I Vapor Recovery System The pipeline installation is illustrating in Diagram 4-2. The height of air pipe at least 4m. The length of back air is shorter than air pipe, diameter larger than that of air pipe. It is prohibited to appear overflow phenomenon as vehicle tank discharge, shut off switch of air pipe. The jointer between air back and discharge pipe should adopt speed jointer. Phase II vapor-recovery system Phase II refers to the progress in which vapor in vehicle tank is fuel dispenser

technical specification

    n activity and result tool and function material and  product.  Associative relations are depicted by a line with arrowheads at each end (see Figure A.3).   Figure A.3 Graphical representation of an associative relation   21  ? ISO 2005 All rights reserved   ISO 9000:2005(E)  A.4 Concept diagrams  Figures A.4 to A.13 show the concept diagrams on which the thematic groupings of fuel dispenser Clause 3 are based.  Since the definitions of the terms are repeated without any related notes it is recommended to refer to Clause 3  to consult any such notes.   Figure A.4 Concepts relating to quality (3.1)  22 ? ISO 2005 All right fuel dispenser s reserved   ISO 9000:2005(E)   Figure A.5 Concepts relating to management (3.2)   23  ? ISO 2005 All rights reserved   ISO 9000:2005(E)   Figure A.6 Concepts relating to organization (3.3)   Figure A.7 Concepts relating to process and product (3.4)  24 ? ISO 2005 All rights reserved   ISO 9000:2005(E)   Figure A.8 Concepts relating to characteristics (3.5)   Figure A.9 Concepts relating to conformity (3.6)   25  ? ISO 2005 Al fuel dispenser

we are committed to create the best workplace, encourage our staffs to put their own personalities into their jobs, and provide them a stage to show themselves.

    eep job cuts at Schering to a minimum and base the group s joint pharmaceuticals business in Berlin (meaning that the economically troubled capital would contain at least one blue-chip firm). By May 29th only 18.5% of Schering shares had been tendered into the takeover. Bayer extended its deadline to June 14th, but without raising its offer price. Merck saw that as a chance either to make a windfall or to wrest control of Schering, and started buying shares. On June 9th Bayer spent �.9 billion in the market to buy 23% of Scher fuel dispenser ing s stock to match Merck s 18.6%. The speculation was that Merck wanted to force concessions out of Bayer, trading control for choice businesses or patents from Bayer or Schering. But Merck was giving nothing away. This week the spending continued. Merck s stake rose to 21.8%. Bayer felt obliged to go above its �6 offer price. Allianz, which had already fuel dispenser pledged its 11% holding, sold it to Bayer outright for �8 a share, raising Bayer s stake to around 36%. By crossing the 30% threshold Bayer was obliged to make a new offer for Schering at a market price. It also filed a suit against Merck in New York, accusing it of flouting American capital-market rules by not explaining its motive for buying the shares. Very soon, however, Merck s motive became clear it was prepared to sell its stake to Bayer for �9 a share, the price of Bayer s renewed bid. Bayer now has close to 60% of Schering in its pocket. It has agreed with Merck to discuss “expanding and developing�co- operation and has dropped the case in New York. Merck is the world s oldest pharmaceuticals company. The Merck family owns 73% of it, and until this year the firm was seen as conservative and typically German. The first surprise was its hostile bid, which was fully supported by the family. The second was its silent assault on the Bayer takeover—behaviour worthy of a “special situations�hedge fund. The battle would have been less public were it not that all three companies, Baye fuel dispenser