U212-A Rolling Display

U212-A Rolling Display

Features:

Power : AC220V , 50Hz

Including : 2 displays , 1 power board , 1 transformer , 1 SSR

The content on the display could be changeable

Easily fixed on fuel dispenser

100% Factory Tested

Qv── flowage passed over in fuel dispenser (L/min.) t── measuring time fuel dispenser (s) Pu── unit price of oil (�L) Pj── money showed in display screen (� Pc── due sum (� EVmax── the maximum value of relative error measured under regulating flow rate;(%) Evmin──the minimum value of relative error measured under regulating flow rate;(%) En──repeatability of measurement (%) EP──error of paid sum 3.2 Determination of testing results Error Ev, Repeatability of measurement En and Due sum error Ep comes out after calculating testing data. The largest value of Error Ev in testing is regarded as the basic error of fuel dispenser according to the regulation of JJG443-98. The larger value of Repeatability of measurement En in two flow rate testing presents the repeatability of fuel dispenser. Error Ev should be 0.3%, repeatability of measurement no more than 0.15%, if beyond these scopes testing fuel dispenser would be determined as unqualified. The contents of money indication and money error are not regulated in the approval procedure of JJG443-98. There would exist a little error after long refueling because usually the calculation of paid money adapts the round –mode. Example of indicating valve appraisal Take an appraisal of fuel dispenser 6~60L/min for example, it is usually adapted non-presetting mode in filing station. Setting unit price as 2.75�L and preparing metal standard measurer of 100L, conduct 3 tests as maximum flow rate 60L/min and minimum flow rate 12L/min, respectively. Testing result is listed in Table 6-1. Table 6-1 Appraisal Results Article IV Important notices in appraisal Indicating value appraisal is crucial part of fuel dispenser’s testing items, which is direct foundation to determine the accuracy and qualification of fuel dispenser. The appraisal method and data processing introduced in Article III is based upon fuel dispenser JJG443-98. Filling station should consult the above procedure and conduct self appraisal in accordance with relative requirements o

sents an IFSF floating point.　　 - Extra text explaining that th fuel dispenser e unit of measurement for the VOLUME　　 field is implied.　　 Chapter 3.3 Calculator Data Base　　 - Data_Id 6 (Country_Code) has a new reference to the acceptance of ISO　　 3166 country codes.　　 - Data_Id 10 (Clear_Display_Mode) has a new reference to the fuelling　　 point s Data_Id 66 (Clear_Display) command.　　 - Data_Id 13 (Max_Auth_Time) added (moved from the Product Data per　　 Fuelling Mode data base Data_Id 5).　　 - Data_Id 44 (Amount_Rounding_Type) has extra examples.　　 - Data_Id 80 (W M_Polynomial) added..　　 - Data_Id 81 (W M_Seed) added.　　 Chapter 3.4 Meter Data Base　　 - Data_Id 20 (Meter_Total) has additio fuel dispenser nal text explaining that some　　 CD s may write to this Data_Id.　　 Chapter 3.6 Product Data per Fuelling Mode Data Base　　 - Data_Id 5 (Max_Auth_Time) moved to Calculator data base Data_Id 13.　　 Chapter 3.7 Fuelling Point Data Base　　 - Data_Id 2 (Nb_Tran_Buffer_Not_Paid) has extra text explaining the　　 correct handling when a write to this Data_Id is not allowed.　　 - Data_Id 3 (Nb_Of_Historic_Trans) has extra text explaining the correct　　 handling when a write to this Data_Id is not allowed. Additionally it is　　 now mandatory to support at least 1 historic transaction buffer.　　 - Data_Id 8 Leak_Log_Noz_Mask has been added.　　 - Data_Id 22 (Assign_Contr_Id) has extra text explaining that a transaction　　 resulting from an assigned FP mus fuel dispenser t go straight to the Locked state.　　 Additionally there is a new DB protection li

ty index tracked by the Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV), a business school, fell fr fuel dispenser om 27.3% of the population in 2003 to 25.1% in 2004. Strong economic growth in 2004 helped. More important, says Marcelo Neri of FGV, was a sharp drop in inequality, which is “now at its lowest level in the past 30 years, and still falling.� The reasons for this are complicated and only partly down to Lula. His predecessor, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, universalised primary education, which accounts for much of the reduction in inequality. He also tweaked Brazil s job-killing labour law, encouraging formal employment. Declining informality and inequality are “new elements on the Brazilian scene which analysts don t fully understand,�says Mr Neri. After a stumble, Lula has helped. Upon taking office, he unveiled an anti-poverty programme called Fome Zero (zero fuel dispenser hunger), which was clearly unworkable. Lula retreated, replacing it with Bolsa Família (family fund). This consolidated five pre-Lula programmes that transferred cash to poor families, raised the benefit and expanded the number of beneficiaries so far to 8.7m families, roughly a fifth of Brazil s population. This makes it “the most important income transfer programme in the world� says Lula. In the poor north-east, with the largest concentration of beneficiaries, the programme can mean the difference between hunger and sufficiency and sustain small-town economies. Bolsa Família draws sneers, too, notably that it provides subsistence, but no exit from poverty. Lula retorts that the conditions attached to the transfer—beneficiaries must keep their children in school and vaccinate their babies—make it more than a handout. “It s an emergency programme,�he sa fuel dispenser ys. “My dream is that one day we won t need Bolsa Família any more because it will have generated employment and aided